Zhixian Yi
Texas Woman's University
United States
zhixianyi@mail.twu.edu
ABSTRACT: Few studies have explored the factors influencing general adult population's Internet use in the United States. This study analyzes data from the U.S. National Opinion Research Center 2000-2004 General Social Survey to determine who is more or less likely to use the Internet for activities other than e-mail. In the valid sample of 1,895 US adults, respondents ranged in age from 18 to 89 years; the average age was 46.3 years. Of these respondents, 54.2% were male, and 78.7% were white. Statistics were calculated using bivariate correlation and logistic regression. Results of the study showed that demographics (such as age and race) and socio-economic status variables (such as education level and household income) play significant roles in predicting the patterns of Internet use. The respondents who were older or African-Americans were less likely to use the Internet for activities other than e-mail. Those with higher levels of education or family income were more likely to use the Internet in this manner. Gender, marital status, region, and employment variables appeared to have no influence. The findings will be helpful to understand people's behaviors and patterns of using the Internet other than email, and may assist local governments, schools and higher education, libraries, information centers, and other agencies when making policies regarding future information technology; distance education programs; and digital resources, services, and tools.
I. Introduction
Access to the Internet and the World Wide Web is ubiquitous within the United States. Because online information is so readily available, the Internet has become a potential driving force of the economy, society, and education. People use the Internet to access the needed information. As a result, societal and educational organizations are challenged to use the Internet more efficiently. Given this climate, it is important to understand the patterns of Internet usage. Studies have been done on Internet technology, technological developments, and services, but there are few studies on individual Internet usage.
People in the United States use the Internet more than any other country in the world (Fusilier et al., 2005). What factors influence individuals who use the Internet for activities other than email? This study seeks to provide an answer, using data from the U.S. National Opinion Research Center 2000-2004 General Social Survey (GSS), and bivariate correlation and logistic regression analysis.
Technically speaking, the Internet is the network of networks. In this study, it also refers to the World Wide Web, one of the services available through the Internet. In the survey, the interviewers treated the Internet and World Wide Web as the same. The findings will be helpful to understand people's behaviors and patterns of using the Internet other than email, and may assist local governments, schools and higher education, libraries, information centers, and other agencies when making policies regarding future information technology; distance education programs; and digital resources, services, and tools.
II. Literature Review
To determine factors influencing Internet usage within the United States, including demographics and socio-economic and employment variables, a literature review of applicable and available research was conducted, focusing on the studies on the main factors related to individuals' use of the Internet or World Wide Web.
According to the literature, teachers and students are the main users of the Internet. Jones and Madden (2002) conducted a study on college students' Internet usage. Browsing the Internet was a daily activity; 73% of college students used the Internet more than the library for research. Seventy-nine percent of the students agreed "that Internet use has had a positive impact on their college academic experience" (Jones and Madden, 2002). Princeton Research Associates for the Pew Internet & American Life Project conducted nationwide telephone surveys, and analyzed how respondents penetrated the Internet. The data results show that all respondents (59%) of the general population did not penetrate the Internet more than those (86%) of college students (Jones and Madden, 2002). These studies seem to be limited because it is not known what factors influence people's Internet use.
Mehra and Papajohn (2007) surveyed 260 international teaching assistants at a representative state university in a semi-rural setting in the United Sates, and analyzed 130 returned surveys. The variables such as gender, marital status, and age were found to be significant predictors in explaining the correlations between communication and information intersections in international teaching assistants' use of the Internet.
Region has been used as an important factor to explore the regional variations in Internet use. Disparities existed in Internet usage by American adults (Spooner, 2003). For the highest rates of Internet penetration, 66% of the adult population used the Internet in New England. The South (48%) was far behind the other regions in use of the Internet. "The largest proportion of female users is in the Mid-Atlantic (54%); the largest of male users is in New England (55%)" (Spooner, 2003).
Outside of the United States, Kumar and Kaur (2006) surveyed 792 teachers and 1,188 undergraduate students in India, and determined that the World Wide Web is an important tool for teaching, research, and learning. These researchers found that 1,587 (99 percent) respondents browsed the Internet for the World Wide Web. However, the study did not determine factors that influenced Internet usage.
In the studies, many variables were used to examine how people use the Internet. Taylor et al. (2003) conducted the computer-assisted telephone interviews to examine the factors that affected home Internet usage patterns in central Queensland, Australia. The variables such as age, gender, location, marital status, education level, family income, and employment status were used in that study. They found significant differences in variables such as gender and age. The males and the youngest group might use the Internet more at home for information search.
Few studies have explored the factors influencing general adult population's use of the Internet other than email in the United States. This study could be useful in providing more significant patterns of Internet use.
III. Study Framework and Hypothesis Development
Internet use depends on many factors. The above reviewed literature serves as the foundation for this study. Based on the available 2000 - 2004 GSS data, this study on Internet use patterns is to primarily test the relationships between people's using the Internet other than email and three types of variables: demographic, socio-economic, and employment variables. Testable hypotheses are proposed.
1. Demographic variables
Age, gender, race, marital status, and region of residence are very important in predicting people's Internet usage. A study on gender differences in use of the Internet illustrates that the gender divide has narrowed considerably (Dholakia, 2006). However, DeBell and Chapman (2006) found that there existed no difference between gender and overall Internet use rates. It is hypothesized that there is no relationship between gender and people's Internet use. According to Ortega Egea (2007), the middle-aged individuals in the European Union used the Internet most frequently. The elderly are hypothesized to be less likely to utilize the Internet. The "never-married" people were found to have a higher level of home Internet usage (Taylor et al., 2003). There existed racial differences of Internet users in some regions, and 7% of the Internet users in the Upper Midwest were African-American or Hispanic (Spooner, 2003). It is hypothesized that the unmarried, African-Americans, and racial minorities are less likely to use the Internet other than email.
According to Spooner (2003), people in New England used the Internet more than those in the South. It is hypothesized that compared with the Internet users in the Northeast, those in the South, Midwest and West are less likely to utilize the Internet.
2. Socio-economic status
Socio-economic status is considered in the analyses of Internet use. A study on home Internet usage reveals socio-economic disparities (Taylor et al., 2003). It is expected that those with higher education levels are more likely to use the Internet because they may have more skills and chances to go online. Those with lower income and occupation prestige score are more likely to use the Internet because they may need more information on employment and occupations.
3. Employment variables
Compared with government employees, private employees are more likely to use the Internet because their working environments are more dynamic and flexible. In comparison with working full-time employees, working part-time and other types of labor status are more likely to use the Internet. Compared with regular and permanent employees, irregular and temporary employees are more likely to use the Internet. The fact that a person has enough time to get the job done shows that he or she may have more leisure time and utilize the Internet more for varieties of needed information.
IV. Data and Methods
The GSS conducts basic scientific research on the structure and development of American society by using a data-collection program designed to monitor social change within the United States. This study used the survey that asked whether respondents ever used the Internet for activities other than email (Davis and Smith, 2005). The sample size studied was 1,895 people between the ages of 18 and 89 years.
The dependent variable of this study, using the Internet for activities other than email, is dichotomous. The independent variables consist of three categories:
The fundamental model was first examined using demographics, then socio-economic status variables, and finally employment variables. Using this method, the study could determine the factors that influenced a dependent variable and how the effect of a predictor changes when new variables are included.
Given the dichotomous dependent variable, logistic regression was used to analyze the data. The sample sizes for the logistic regression models varied because some independent variables did not apply.
V. Findings and Discussion
A total of 1,895 respondents participated in the GSS survey used (Davis and Smith, 2005, 979) (Table 1, Appendix 1). Of this number, 86.3% used the Internet for activities other than email. Respondents ranged in age from 18 to 89 years; the average age was 46.3 years. Of these respondents, 54.2% were male. Ethnicity was noted as 78.7% white, 14.6% African-American, and 6.7% other races. The average year of schooling was 13.4 years, which seems low, and implies that some respondents were not well-educated. The median family income is 17, which indicates that the median family income of the respondents is between $35,000 and $39,999.
Table 2 (see Appendix 2) reports the estimates of three nested logistic regression models used to predict Internet usage for activities other than email. In Model 2, the model x2 increases by 82.9 (= 159.1 - 76.2 ), which is extremely statistically significant at beyond the 0.001 level with a difference of 3 degrees of freedom. This suggests that socio-economic status is very important in predicting the Internet use other than email. The employment variables are added up in Model 3, and make the model x2 decrease by 34.7. Model 2 is the best fitting model, on which the interpretations mainly focus.
As shown in Model 2, age has an extremely significant and negative effect on the dependent variable. This result coincides with our expectation. The older the respondents are, the less likely they are to use the Internet other than email. For each additional year increase in age, the probability of using the Internet other than email would decrease by 3.9%. Compared with the whites, African-Americans are less likely to use the Internet other than email. This is consistent with the hypothesis. There is extremely significant and positive relationship between schooling year and the Internet use. For each additional year increase in schooling, the probability of using the Internet increases by 15.1%. This supports the expectation that those with more schooling years are more likely to use the Internet. The relationship between family income and the Internet use is significant and positive. For each additional level increase in family income, the probability of the Internet use increases by 4.4%. In addition, there is extremely significant and positive relationship between the Internet use and occupational prestige score. For each additional score increase in occupational prestige, the probability of the Internet use increases by 3.5%. These reject the hypothesis that those with lower income and occupational prestige score are more likely to use the Internet.
In Table 3 (see Appendix 3), bivariate correlations show that there are many significant associations between the independent variables and the Internet use other than e-mail, and among the predictors. The variables of age, African-American, not permanent employee, and having enough time to get the job done are negatively correlated with the Internet use. The other variables such as schooling and family income are positively correlated with using the Internet other than email. The results of the correlation matrix indicates that age has the very weak correlation with the Internet use (r = -0.167) and implies that the older people are less likely to use the Internet other than email in this study.
VI. Conclusion
Using the 2000-2004 GSS data, with a large national sample size, the study is able to examine many factors that affect Internet use. The main findings in this study show that demographics (such as age and race) and socio-economic status variables (such as education level and household income) play significant roles in predicting patterns of the Internet usage for activities other than email.
In this study, older respondents and African-Americans are less likely to use the Internet in this manner. Those with more years of schooling or higher levels of family income are more likely to use the Internet. Gender, marital status, region of residence, and employment do not appear to be significant factors affecting Internet usage.
Internet usage may also vary between computer owners and computer users. Further research is needed to shed more light on behaviors and patterns that affect Internet usage.
Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (2005). General social surveys, 1972-2004 [machine-readable data file]. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and Internet use by students in 2003 (NCES 2006-065). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Dholakia, R. R. (2006). Gender and IT in the household: Evolving patterns of Internet use in the United States. Information Society, 22(4): 231-240.
Fusilier, M., Durlabhji, S., Cucchi, A, & Collins, M. (2005). A four-country investigation of factors facilitating student Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(5): 454-464.
Jones, S., & Madden, M. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Kumar, R., & Kaur, A. (2006). Internet use by teachers and students in engineering colleges of Punjab, Haryana, and Himachal Pradesh states of India: An analysis. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 7(1). Retrieved January 21, 2007, from http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v07n01/kumar_r01.htm
Mehra, B., & Papajohn, D. (2007). "Glocal" patterns of communication-information convergences in Internet use: Cross-cultural behavior of international teaching assistants in a culturally alien information environment. The International Information & Library Review, 39, 12-30.
Ortega Egea, J. M., Menendez, M. R., & Gonzalez, M. V. R. (2007). Diffusion and usage patterns of Internet services in the European Union. Information Research, 12(2). Retrieved January 21, 2007, from http://InformationR.net/ir/12-2/paper302.html
Spooner, T. (2003). Internet use by region in the United States. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Taylor, W. J., Zhu, G. X., Dekkers, J., & Marshall, S. (2003). Socio-economic factors affecting home Internet usage patterns in central Queensland. Informing Science Journal, 6, 233-246.




| Yi, Zhixian. (2008). Internet Use Patterns in the United States. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 25. URL: http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl25yi.htm |